Speaking Truth to Skepticism

Every once in a while I run into a person (such as student) who
confidently and proudly offers the following philosophical aphorism:
“Your truth is true for you, and my truth is true for me.”
My first reaction, when I hear this, is to ask myself whether any real communication is possible if this statement is, um, true.
I know that folks who are followers of Christ run into this sometimes,
and feel frustrated … again, because it is a conversation-stopper.
Now, the standard Christian apologetics response might be to ask,
“Is that statement just true for you, or are you insisting that it
is also true for me?”
Or something along those lines.
But that’s an unfair response, or at least an unhelpful one. That’s
because it’s likely that this person is so steeped in
“postmodernism” (or late modernism, or post-postmodernism, or
whatever label you like), that categories such as moral truth and
metaphysical truth have no meaning. So, to hold up a mirror and show
the incoherence and inherent falsehood of their claim will likely
just confuse them.
No progress is being made.
So if we want to eventually have an opportunity to present the
Gospel in a way that can actually make sense to that person, it helpful to at least try to understand the
philosophical foundations (such as they are) on which they stand — even if they do not realize it. This
requires, among other things, at least some working knowledge of the
ideas generally clustered around the notion of postmodernism. It
also requires attentiveness, empathy, and, frankly, love.
There are many ways to accomplish the first requirement, but one of
the easiest and most accessible, in my opinion, would be to view the
lectures presented at a 2007 Ligonier conference with the theme
“Contending for the Truth.”
The topics at that conference included:
- Postmodernism and Philosophy, presented by Ravi Zacharias
- Postmodernism and Society, presented by Al Mohler
- Postmodernism and Christianity, presented by R.C. Sproul, Jr.
- The Task of Apologetics, presented by R.C. Sproul
Tim Keller has also offered some thoughts and tools. Chapter 5 of his book, Preaching: Communicating Faith in an Age of Skepticism, is particularly informative and helpful. I will have more to say about the content of that chapter in a future blog post.
Meanwhile, the question on the table is this: How do we better prepare
ourselves in order to communicate the truth of the Gospel to those who
resist the notion of truth itself?
Understanding the postmodernism is a first step.